Marketing measurement

Marketing mix modeling, built to allocate budget

Measurement that changes where the money goes. Bayesian MMM, incrementality, response curves and budget allocation, deployed as a system your team runs on a monthly cadence.

What this usually looks like

  • Attribution and MMM disagree, and nobody can say which one to act on.
  • The model reports ROI by channel, but the budget meeting still runs on last year plus ten percent.
  • A model was delivered once, as a deck. Nobody has rerun it since.
  • Finance and marketing are arguing about incrementality with no shared definition of baseline.

What you get

A calibrated MMM

Adstock and saturation fitted per channel, with priors that hold up when a channel goes dark. Uncertainty reported, not hidden.

An allocation you can act on

Marginal ROI equalised across channels under real constraints: minimum spends, contracted commitments, agency lead times.

A monthly operating cadence

Refresh, review, reallocate. The model earns its keep by being rerun, not by being right once.

The handover

Code, documentation, drift checks and the training to run it without me.

How it starts

Diagnostic first, build second.

01 · Decision System Diagnostic

Three weeks, fixed scope. We establish the decision, the data that exists, and whether MMM is even the right instrument. You get an executive readout and a roadmap. Any team can execute it, including not me.

02 · Design and build

The model, the allocation logic, the pipeline, the review cadence. Scoped from the roadmap, priced on the engagement rather than by the day.

03 · Operate and hand over

Monitoring, drift controls, documentation. The goal is a system your team owns.