Marketing Science

Baseline vs Incremental Sales Explorer

A simple interactive tool to understand what marketing is really moving. Adjust baseline demand, spend, seasonality, and saturation to see how observed sales split between baseline and incremental lift.

Core idea

Observed Sales = Baseline + Incremental

The main view is contribution over time. The response curve is only a supporting mechanic.

Baseline sales level1,200
2005,000
Channel spend$60k
$0k$180k
Seasonality contextNeutral
Soft demandStrong demand
Selected weekWeek 6
W1W12
Current efficiency zoneMaturing efficiency

Incremental sales still matter, but the curve is flattening. This is where teams often confuse large observed sales with strong marginal impact.

Why this matters

Marketing does not create the whole business from zero. It operates on top of baseline demand.

That baseline moves over time because real demand conditions move over time.

The point of decomposition is not to remove complexity. It is to make the mechanics legible.

Built-in assumptions

Response shape, saturation point, and weekly spend variation are fixed in this version. The goal is to teach the decomposition clearly before exposing modeling assumptions.

Selected week spend
$60k

Current media pressure in the selected period

Baseline sales
1,387

73.9% of observed sales

Incremental sales
489

26.1% of observed sales

Naive overclaim factor
3.8x

If all observed sales were credited to the channel

Contribution over time

Stacked decomposition makes the baseline visible week by week.

This is the main chart. Each bar shows observed sales split into baseline demand and channel-driven incrementality for each week.

Baseline sales
Incremental sales
Total sales

Selected week breakdown

Waterfall view for Week 6

This makes the logic explicit: observed sales are the result of baseline demand plus incremental lift, not a single undifferentiated number.

Baseline

1,387

Incremental

489

Total

1,876

Mechanics

The response curve is still useful, but only as supporting context.

This chart explains why the incremental layer changes with spend. It should support the decomposition, not replace it.

Incremental share

26.1%

Marginal sales / next $1k

4.0

Interpretation

How to read Week 6

The channel is adding meaningful lift, but baseline demand is still doing most of the work. This is the zone where decomposition is most useful for decision-making.

This is a seasonally strong period. Some of the observed performance comes from demand conditions, not just channel pressure.

The selected week is already in a flatter zone. Total contribution still looks good, but marginal gains are softening.

Caution

This tool is for intuition and communication. Real baseline and incrementality measurement still depends on modeling assumptions, identification strategy, and experimental or quasi-experimental evidence.